Justice Department revamps consent decree rules: what the press missed


The feds plan to be less heavy-handed in using consent decrees to micromanage states and cities, and there’s a good case for that, I argue at National Review. Alas, as I explain, national media bungled the story in November by characterizing Jeff Sessions’s memo as if it were primarily aimed at reducing oversight of police. “Not once in its seven pages does the word ‘police’ even appear.”

My short piece doesn’t take up the question of how the well-documented problems of consent decrees in other areas are to be weighed against the possible advantages of the device in curbing abuse-prone police departments. But at least some advocates of police reform and accountability have expressed doubts about whether the process, which can sometimes take political pressure off the local authority, really works as advertised [David Meyer Lindenberg, Tim Lynch, Scott Greenfield; see also John McGinnis]

Tags: consent decrees, Department of Justice, federalism, police, WO writings

Tags: Law, Police, Uncategorized, Department Of Justice, Justice Department, Jeff Sessions, WO writings, Consent Decrees, Federalism, John McGinnis, David Meyer Lindenberg Tim Lynch Scott Greenfield

Source:  http://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/justice-department-revamps-consent-decree-rules-what-the-press-missed/



Related:
March 23, 2018 at 10:06 AM Police misconduct roundup
October 23, 2017 at 12:05 AM “Against Collusive Consent Decrees, For Police Reform”
October 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM EPA swears off collusive settlements
April 20, 2017 at 12:05 AM Environment roundup